Surname statistics for Watters

There are approximately 4,495 people named Watters in the UK. That makes it the 2,337th most common surname overall. Out of every million people in the UK, approximately 71 are named Watters.

Frequency Comparisons
TotalRankFrequency %Per million people
Great Britain
United Kingdom (current)44952337N/A71
United Kingdom (1881 census)95540860.00332
Change since 1881+3540+1749+0.004+39
Other Countries
United States111442970N/A41
Australia10511570N/A64

Politics

People with the surname Watters are slightly more likely to be politicians than the average member of the population. When they do become politicians, they are most likely to be elected as Labour.

As of the most recent set of elections, the political parties represented by politicians called Watters are:

  1. Labour (2)
More stats for the politics nerds!

Top male forenames

David Watters
John Watters
Robert Watters
Andrew Watters
James Watters
Mark Watters
Alan Watters
Peter Watters
Richard Watters
Paul Watters
William Watters
Thomas Watters
Charles Watters
Stephen Watters
Colin Watters
Derek Watters
Ian Watters
Iain Watters
George Watters
Gerard Watters

Top female forenames

Margaret Watters
Claire Watters
Anne Watters
Heather Watters
Emma Watters
Sarah Watters
Helen Watters
Fiona Watters
Patricia Watters
Paula Watters
Linda Watters
Gillian Watters
Alison Watters
Angela Watters
Barbara Watters
Christine Watters
Deborah Watters
Mary Watters
Ruth Watters
Sharon Watters

Notes

  • Total is the total number of people with that surname.
  • Rank is the position in the list of names ordered by total (eg, a rank of 1 means that it's the most common name, and a rank of 10 means it's the tenth most common, etc).
  • Frequency is the percentage of people with that surname.
  • Per million people is the number of people with that surname per million of the population.

All of these are approximate figures, and the current figures especially so. The 1881 census figures are correct for what was recorded on the census, but we don't really know how accurate it was. At least, though the 1881 figures won't change, as it's a snapshot of a point in time. The current figures, by contrast, are variable according to births, deaths, migration and marriages, so the values shown here are only a best approximation to whatever was the case when the underlying data was collated and will not be the same as whatever the values are right now.

'N/A' indicates that we don't have data for this name in that country or time (usually because it's quite uncommon there and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one there with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the UK as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.