Surname statistics for Walmsley

There are approximately 9,890 people named Walmsley in the UK. That makes it the 1,067th most common surname overall. Out of every million people in the UK, approximately 157 are named Walmsley.

Frequency Comparisons
TotalRankFrequency %Per million people
Great Britain
United Kingdom (current)98901067N/A157
United Kingdom (1881 census)61977040.021207
Change since 1881+3693-363-0.005-50
Other Countries
United States200513830N/A7
Australia11631418N/A71

Politics

People with the surname Walmsley are more likely to be politicians than the average member of the population. When they do become politicians, they are most likely to be elected as Conservative.

As of the most recent set of elections, the political parties represented by politicians called Walmsley are:

  1. Conservative (2)
  2. Thornaby Independent Association (2)
  3. Labour (1)
More stats for the politics nerds!

Top male forenames

David Walmsley
John Walmsley
Mark Walmsley
James Walmsley
Michael Walmsley
Paul Walmsley
Robert Walmsley
Peter Walmsley
Stephen Walmsley
Richard Walmsley
Andrew Walmsley
Ian Walmsley
Alan Walmsley
Anthony Walmsley
Christopher Walmsley
William Walmsley
Neil Walmsley
Steven Walmsley
Philip Walmsley
Jonathan Walmsley

Top female forenames

Susan Walmsley
Julie Walmsley
Elizabeth Walmsley
Ann Walmsley
Joan Walmsley
Patricia Walmsley
Claire Walmsley
Christine Walmsley
Sarah Walmsley
Carol Walmsley
Angela Walmsley
Margaret Walmsley
Samantha Walmsley
Sandra Walmsley
Janet Walmsley
Sharon Walmsley
Jacqueline Walmsley
Mary Walmsley
Lisa Walmsley
Linda Walmsley

Notes

  • Total is the total number of people with that surname.
  • Rank is the position in the list of names ordered by total (eg, a rank of 1 means that it's the most common name, and a rank of 10 means it's the tenth most common, etc).
  • Frequency is the percentage of people with that surname.
  • Per million people is the number of people with that surname per million of the population.

All of these are approximate figures, and the current figures especially so. The 1881 census figures are correct for what was recorded on the census, but we don't really know how accurate it was. At least, though the 1881 figures won't change, as it's a snapshot of a point in time. The current figures, by contrast, are variable according to births, deaths, migration and marriages, so the values shown here are only a best approximation to whatever was the case when the underlying data was collated and will not be the same as whatever the values are right now.

'N/A' indicates that we don't have data for this name in that country or time (usually because it's quite uncommon there and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one there with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the UK as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.