Surname statistics for Hannaford

There are approximately 2,077 people named Hannaford in the UK. That makes it the 4,373rd most common surname overall. Out of every million people in the UK, approximately 33 are named Hannaford.

Frequency Comparisons
TotalRankFrequency %Per million people
Great Britain
United Kingdom (current)20774373N/A33
United Kingdom (1881 census)138130080.00546
Change since 1881+696-1365-0.002-13
Other Countries
United States126019775less than 0.0015
Australia8441938N/A52

Politics

People with the surname Hannaford are likely to be politicians than the average member of the population. When they do become politicians, they are most likely to be elected as Labour.

As of the most recent set of elections, the political parties represented by politicians called Hannaford are:

  1. Labour (2)
  2. Liberal Democrat (1)
  3. Independent (1)
More stats for the politics nerds!

Top male forenames

Peter Hannaford
Mark Hannaford
John Hannaford
David Hannaford
Michael Hannaford
James Hannaford
Ronald Hannaford
Robert Hannaford
Richard Hannaford
Jason Hannaford
Nicholas Hannaford
Matthew Hannaford
Terence Hannaford
Ian Hannaford
Paul Hannaford
Alan Hannaford
Martin Hannaford
Lee Hannaford
Jonathan Hannaford

Top female forenames

Sarah Hannaford
Elizabeth Hannaford
Patricia Hannaford
Alexandra Hannaford
Irene Hannaford
Charlotte Hannaford
Frances Hannaford
Anne Hannaford
Angela Hannaford
Christine Hannaford
Sharon Hannaford
Kate Hannaford
Rachel Hannaford
Luan Hannaford
Lisa Hannaford
Tania Hannaford
Alison Hannaford
Gillian Hannaford
Karen Hannaford

Notes

  • Total is the total number of people with that surname.
  • Rank is the position in the list of names ordered by total (eg, a rank of 1 means that it's the most common name, and a rank of 10 means it's the tenth most common, etc).
  • Frequency is the percentage of people with that surname.
  • Per million people is the number of people with that surname per million of the population.

All of these are approximate figures, and the current figures especially so. The 1881 census figures are correct for what was recorded on the census, but we don't really know how accurate it was. At least, though the 1881 figures won't change, as it's a snapshot of a point in time. The current figures, by contrast, are variable according to births, deaths, migration and marriages, so the values shown here are only a best approximation to whatever was the case when the underlying data was collated and will not be the same as whatever the values are right now.

'N/A' indicates that we don't have data for this name in that country or time (usually because it's quite uncommon there and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one there with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the UK as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.