Surname statistics for Flower

There are approximately 7,034 people named Flower in the UK. That makes it the 1,526th most common surname overall. Out of every million people in the UK, approximately 111 are named Flower.

Frequency Comparisons
TotalRankFrequency %Per million people
Great Britain
United Kingdom (current)70341526N/A111
United Kingdom (1881 census)292515340.0198
Change since 1881+4109+8+0.001+13
Other Countries
United States37538136N/A14
Australia7772086N/A48

Politics

People with the surname Flower are slightly more likely to be politicians than the average member of the population. When they do become politicians, they are most likely to be elected as Conservative.

As of the most recent set of elections, the political parties represented by politicians called Flower are:

  1. Conservative (3)
More stats for the politics nerds!

Top male forenames

David Flower
Richard Flower
Paul Flower
John Flower
Michael Flower
Peter Flower
Andrew Flower
Stephen Flower
Mark Flower
James Flower
Steven Flower
Robert Flower
Martin Flower
Christopher Flower
Simon Flower
Matthew Flower
Ian Flower
Anthony Flower
Graham Flower
Daniel Flower

Top female forenames

Claire Flower
Helen Flower
Teresa Flower
Margaret Flower
Sandra Flower
Linda Flower
Julia Flower
Alison Flower
Elizabeth Flower
Jennifer Flower
Diana Flower
Clare Flower
Julie Flower
Joan Flower
Lynda Flower
Louise Flower
Patricia Flower
Susan Flower
Gemma Flower
Jacqueline Flower

Notes

  • Total is the total number of people with that surname.
  • Rank is the position in the list of names ordered by total (eg, a rank of 1 means that it's the most common name, and a rank of 10 means it's the tenth most common, etc).
  • Frequency is the percentage of people with that surname.
  • Per million people is the number of people with that surname per million of the population.

All of these are approximate figures, and the current figures especially so. The 1881 census figures are correct for what was recorded on the census, but we don't really know how accurate it was. At least, though the 1881 figures won't change, as it's a snapshot of a point in time. The current figures, by contrast, are variable according to births, deaths, migration and marriages, so the values shown here are only a best approximation to whatever was the case when the underlying data was collated and will not be the same as whatever the values are right now.

'N/A' indicates that we don't have data for this name in that country or time (usually because it's quite uncommon there and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one there with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the UK as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.