Surname statistics for Field

There are approximately 30,329 people named Field in the UK. That makes it the 305th most common surname overall. Out of every million people in the UK, approximately 480 are named Field.

Frequency Comparisons
TotalRankFrequency %Per million people
Great Britain
United Kingdom (current)30329305N/A480
United Kingdom (1881 census)149012680.05498
Change since 1881+15428-37-0.002-18
Other Countries
United States243741329N/A90
Australia5208266N/A319

Politics

People with the surname Field are slightly less likely to be politicians than the average member of the population. When they do become politicians, they are most likely to be elected as Liberal Democrat.

As of the most recent set of elections, the political parties represented by politicians called Field are:

  1. Liberal Democrat (5)
  2. Conservative (2)
  3. Labour (2)
More stats for the politics nerds!

Top male forenames

David Field
John Field
Andrew Field
Richard Field
Peter Field
Paul Field
Michael Field
Robert Field
Stephen Field
Christopher Field
Mark Field
Anthony Field
James Field
Alan Field
Graham Field
Martin Field
Steven Field
Colin Field
Jonathan Field
Brian Field

Top female forenames

Susan Field
Sarah Field
Patricia Field
Julie Field
Christine Field
Ann Field
Jane Field
Margaret Field
Helen Field
Janet Field
Nicola Field
Jennifer Field
Karen Field
Angela Field
Elizabeth Field
Sally Field
Lesley Field
Sharon Field
Michelle Field
Joanne Field

Notes

  • Total is the total number of people with that surname.
  • Rank is the position in the list of names ordered by total (eg, a rank of 1 means that it's the most common name, and a rank of 10 means it's the tenth most common, etc).
  • Frequency is the percentage of people with that surname.
  • Per million people is the number of people with that surname per million of the population.

All of these are approximate figures, and the current figures especially so. The 1881 census figures are correct for what was recorded on the census, but we don't really know how accurate it was. At least, though the 1881 figures won't change, as it's a snapshot of a point in time. The current figures, by contrast, are variable according to births, deaths, migration and marriages, so the values shown here are only a best approximation to whatever was the case when the underlying data was collated and will not be the same as whatever the values are right now.

'N/A' indicates that we don't have data for this name in that country or time (usually because it's quite uncommon there and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one there with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the UK as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.