Top surnames from the 1881 census in Teigh, Rutland

Teigh is an 1881 census registration district in the county of Rutland

Registration districts were originally created for the registration of births, marriages and deaths, rather than specifically for the census. In many cases, registration districts were broadly equivalent to parishes, but not necessarily so.

Top surnames by total occurrences

Surname Total Frequency Index
RAWLINGS1410.6061725.39
HALLAM129.0909487.80
FRISBY86.06061,403.51
WOOLLEY86.0606305.34
WASS86.06061,111.11
RODGERS86.0606221.61
BAKER75.303024.20
PERKINS64.5455101.01
GREEN43.030310.76
HINMAN43.03036,666.67
GARNER43.030395.92
NEWBY32.2727227.27
GOODMAN32.272777.92
CLARKE32.272711.22
BAILEY21.515210.06
HARRIS21.51525.96
NAYLOR21.515240.24
BRIGHT21.515274.91
TIDD21.51521,333.33
BENNETT10.75764.61
WARD10.75763.47
HAWLEY10.757677.52
STOKES10.757617.95
CANNON10.757641.84
LEE10.75764.64
BEAL10.757680.65
VIRDEN10.75765,000.00
WOOD10.75762.38
WARNER10.757620.79
ROBINSON10.75762.38
PEACH10.757669.93
CHAMBERLAIN10.757627.86
WILLIAMSON10.75768.45
NAILER10.75761,666.67

Top surnames by population index

Surname Index Total Frequency
HINMAN0.131326666.6667
VIRDEN0.131325000.0000
NAILER0.131321666.6667
FRISBY0.131321403.5088
TIDD0.131321333.3333
WASS0.131321111.1111
RAWLINGS0.13132725.3886
HALLAM0.13132487.8049
WOOLLEY0.13132305.3435
NEWBY0.13132227.2727
RODGERS0.13132221.6066
PERKINS0.13132101.0101
GARNER0.1313295.9233
BEAL0.1313280.6452
GOODMAN0.1313277.9221
HAWLEY0.1313277.5194
BRIGHT0.1313274.9064
PEACH0.1313269.9301
CANNON0.1313241.8410
NAYLOR0.1313240.2414
CHAMBERLAIN0.1313227.8552
BAKER0.1313224.2047
WARNER0.1313220.7900
STOKES0.1313217.9533
CLARKE0.1313211.2150
GREEN0.1313210.7614
BAILEY0.1313210.0604
WILLIAMSON0.131328.4531
HARRIS0.131325.9613
LEE0.131324.6361
BENNETT0.131324.6083
WARD0.131323.4674
WOOD0.131322.3776
ROBINSON0.131322.3759

The Total column shows the total number of people in that county or town with this surname. For example, there were 132 people called HINMAN in Teigh at the time of the 1881 census.

The Frequency column shows the percentage of people in this county or town with this surname. For example, a frequency of 6666.6667 in Teigh means that 6666.6667% of the people in Teigh on census day were called HINMAN.

The Index column shows the relative probability of finding someone called HINMAN in this county or town, compared with the probability of finding them anywhere in Britain as a whole. An index of 1 means that if you pick someone at random from this county or town, you have exactly the same probability of picking someone called HINMAN as if you picked at random from the whole of the UK. Where the index is higher than 1, then you are more likely to find someone called HINMAN here than if you picked from the UK as a whole, and where it's lower then you are less likely. The actual figure shows the level of probability - for example, a figure of 2 would indicate that you are twice as likely to find someone called HINMAN here than in the UK as a whole, and 10 would make it ten times as likely. The value of 0.13 in Teigh means that you are 0.13 times as likely to find someone with the surname of HINMAN in Teigh than you would be in the whole of the UK.

All the surnames recorded in Teigh in 1881

(including typos, unknowns and the ones we don't have any data for!)

BAILEY (2)  BAKER (7)  BEAL (1)  BENNETT (1)  BOLLANDS (1)  BRABBEN (1)  BRIGHT (2)  CANNON (1)  CHAMBERLAIN (1)  CLARKE (3)  FRISBY (8)  GARNER (4)  GOODMAN (3)  GREEN (4)  HALLAM (12)  HINMAN (4)  HARRIS (2)  HAWLEY (1)  LAXTEN (1)  LEE (1)  NAILER (1)  NAYLOR (2)  NEWBY (3)  PEACH (1)  PERKINS (6)  PILLMORE (11)  ROBINSON (1)  RODGERS (8)  RAWLINGS (14)  STOKES (1)  TIDD (2)  VIRDEN (1)  WARD (1)  WARNER (1)  WASS (8)  WILLIAMSON (1)  WOOD (1)  WOOLLEY (8)  WORSDALE (1)