Surname statistics for Rayner

There are approximately 16,836 people named Rayner in the UK. That makes it the 601th most common surname overall. Out of every million people in the UK, approximately 266 are named Rayner.

Frequency Comparisons
TotalRankFrequency %Per million people
Great Britain
United Kingdom (current)16836601N/A266
United Kingdom (1881 census)74705690.025249
Change since 1881+9366-32+0.002+17
Other Countries
United States37488145N/A14
Australia3140490N/A192

Politics

People with the surname Rayner are more likely to be politicians than the average member of the population. When they do become politicians, they are most likely to be elected as Conservative.

As of the most recent set of elections, the political parties represented by politicians called Rayner are:

  1. Conservative (3)
  2. Labour (3)
  3. Plaid Cymru (1)
  4. Independent Community and Health Concern (1)
  5. Independent Community & Health Concern & Residents (1)
More stats for the politics nerds!

Top male forenames

David Rayner
Michael Rayner
Paul Rayner
John Rayner
Mark Rayner
Andrew Rayner
Stephen Rayner
Peter Rayner
Christopher Rayner
Martin Rayner
James Rayner
Alan Rayner
Ian Rayner
Robert Rayner
Keith Rayner
Richard Rayner
Simon Rayner
Brian Rayner
Matthew Rayner
Jonathan Rayner

Top female forenames

Susan Rayner
Janet Rayner
Julie Rayner
Sarah Rayner
Joanne Rayner
Michelle Rayner
Helen Rayner
Heather Rayner
Margaret Rayner
Jacqueline Rayner
Patricia Rayner
Jennifer Rayner
Deborah Rayner
Louise Rayner
Samantha Rayner
Elizabeth Rayner
Pamela Rayner
Jane Rayner
Charlotte Rayner
Karen Rayner

Notes

  • Total is the total number of people with that surname.
  • Rank is the position in the list of names ordered by total (eg, a rank of 1 means that it's the most common name, and a rank of 10 means it's the tenth most common, etc).
  • Frequency is the percentage of people with that surname.
  • Per million people is the number of people with that surname per million of the population.

All of these are approximate figures, and the current figures especially so. The 1881 census figures are correct for what was recorded on the census, but we don't really know how accurate it was. At least, though the 1881 figures won't change, as it's a snapshot of a point in time. The current figures, by contrast, are variable according to births, deaths, migration and marriages, so the values shown here are only a best approximation to whatever was the case when the underlying data was collated and will not be the same as whatever the values are right now.

'N/A' indicates that we don't have data for this name in that country or time (usually because it's quite uncommon there and our stats don't go down that far). It doesn't mean that there's no-one there with that name at all!

For less common surnames, the figures get progressively less reliable the fewer holders of that name there are. This data is aggregated from several public lists, and some stats are interpolated from known values. The margin of error is well over 100% at the rarest end of the table!

It's possible for a surname to gain in rank and/or total while being less common per million people (or vice versa) as there are now more surnames in the UK as a result of immigration. In mathematical terms, the tail has got longer, with a far larger number of less common surnames.